• Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Department of Biochemistry
    • Prof. Pinakpani Chakrabarti
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Department of Biochemistry
    • Prof. Pinakpani Chakrabarti
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Dissection of Specific and Non-specific Protein-Protein Interfaces

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Untitled Document.pdf (5.508Mb)
    Date
    2004-02-27
    Author
    Bahadur, R. P.
    Chakrabarti, Pinakpani
    Rodier, F.
    Janin, J.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We compare the geometric and physical-chemical properties of interfaces involved in specific and non-specific protein-protein interactions in crystal structures reported in the Protein Data Bank. Specific interactions are illustrated by 70 protein-protein complexes and by subunit contacts in 122 homodimeric proteins; non-specific interactions are illustrated by 188 pairs of monomeric proteins making crystal-packing contacts selected to bury more than 800 A(2) of protein surface. A majority of these pairs have 2-fold symmetry and form "crystal dimers" that cannot be distinguished, from real dimers on the basis of the interface size or symmetry The chemical and amino acid compositions of the large crystal-packing interfaces resemble the protein solvent-accessible surface. These interfaces are less hydrophobic than in homodimers and contain much fewer fully buried atoms. We develop a residue propensity score and a hydrophobic interaction score to assess preferences seen in the chemical and amino acid compositions of the different types of interfaces, and we derive indexes to evaluate the atomic packing, which we find to be less compact at nonspecific than at specific interfaces. We test the capacity of these parameters to identify homodimeric proteins in crystal structures, and show that a simple combination of the non-polar interface area and the fraction of buried interface atoms assigns the quaternary structure of 88% of the homodimers and 77% of the monomers in our data set correctly. These success rates increase to 93-95% when the residue propensity score of the interfaces is taken into consideration.
    URI
    1. Full Text Link ->
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002228360400018X
    =================================================
    2. Scopus : Citation Link ->
    http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-1042275583&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&nlo=&nlr=&nls=&sid=73A57C52424FF190B4047D17E07C5E8C.I0QkgbIjGqqLQ4Nw7dqZ4A%3a210&sot=aut&sdt=a&sl=39&s=AU-ID%28"Chakrabarti%2c+Pinak"+35067772900%29&relpos=109&relpos=9&searchTerm=AU-ID%28%5C%26quot%3BChakrabarti%2C+Pinak%5C%26quot%3B+35067772900%29
    Collections
    • Prof. Pinakpani Chakrabarti [28]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV